Some surveys find higher reported loneliness among younger adults, but a cross-sectional measure does not establish that a generation is the “loneliest in recorded history” or show why someone uses an AI companion. Cigna Group’s 2025 report, based on its 2024 Vitality Index, classified 67% of U.S. Gen Z adults (born 1997–2006) as lonely. The result describes that survey and definition, not every young adult. Read Cigna’s report and methodology.
For the small church pastor, Gen Z young adults represent both a pastoral challenge and a significant opportunity. They are asking genuine questions about relationship, meaning, and spiritual authority. AI companions are one of the places they are looking for answers. The church can be another — if it engages honestly.
The Gen Z Loneliness Context
AI companion services are marketed as available and responsive, but individual products and experiences differ. Avoid assuming every user is lonely, socially rejected, or anxious. Ask what the person values about the tool, whether they have concerns, and what human support they want.
How to Ask About AI Companion Use
Available research does not support a general ranking of how teenagers and young adults use AI companions. Product features and individual reasons for use vary; ask rather than infer.
People may use companion products for conversation, role-play, journaling, or other purposes. Available sources do not establish which uses are most common among Gen Z adults. Ask the person what they use the tool for, what they find useful, and whether any aspect concerns them. Do not infer loneliness, social avoidance, or a need for therapy from use alone.
Barna’s survey reported that 39% of Gen Z respondents said AI spiritual guidance was as trustworthy as a pastor’s. This is a reported trust measure; it does not establish that respondents used a companion app or replaced pastoral care. Read the Barna research and methodology.
Some products offer romantic or companion personas. That describes product features, not how often Gen Z uses them. If the topic arises, ask how the person understands the relationship and discuss boundaries, privacy, and their own faith commitments without assuming harm.
Do not assume someone uses an AI companion because human relationships feel risky. Ask open questions and let the person describe their own experience.
The Spiritual Authority Question
Barna’s 2026 survey reported that 39% of Gen Z respondents said AI spiritual guidance was as trustworthy as a pastor’s. This is a self-reported trust measure, not evidence that respondents use AI companions for spiritual care. Read Barna’s findings.
The survey does not explain why respondents trust AI spiritual guidance. In pastoral conversations, avoid assuming that a person has been harmed by a church or lacks human relationships; ask about their own experience and what support they want.
Respond to the person in front of you: be clear about what you know and do not know, take questions seriously, and offer conversation or community without pressure.
Practical Pastoral Engagement
A person who uses an AI companion should not be presumed disconnected from church or lacking human relationships. Ask open questions, listen without shame, and offer community or pastoral support if wanted.
A practical response begins with curiosity: What do you use the tool for? What do you appreciate about it? Are there concerns you want to talk through? Offer human connection and pastoral support if the person wants it; do not treat app use as evidence that they lack relationships.
See also: A youth pastor’s guide to AI companions.
Free Church AI Policy Template
Download the free MinistryPlace Church AI Policy Template — plain language, ready to adapt for your congregation in a single board meeting.